Should animals be kept in cages argumentative essay

Cant be hunted and cant be killed off with deforestation. I fear they will be in majority in zoos soon enough. As governments of world dont give a damn. But at least not extinct. The means is not proportionate to what is achieved It is cruel and inhumane to keep animals in cages purely for human entertainment. We visit the zoo maybe one day in a year for a few hours and we may gain some trivial sense of joy out of it. However, the animals have to stay in that zoo all year round; against their natural instincts to roam free. They have no reprieve from their environment.

Why should humans think that they can keep animals out of their homes and in glass houses just for human entertainment? It is neither fair nor proportionate. Humans get food and medical treatment in jails; does that mean that prisoners are happy or that confinement is not punitive?

Freedom for all living things. This argument assumes that a The harm suffered by these animals is tremendous and that b the only value gained from zoos is human entertainment.

  • thesis on vocabulary and reading comprehension.
  • Should Animals Be Kept in the Zoo? - Free Essay Example by Essaylead.
  • metamorphoses ovid essays.
  • steve bruce secularisation thesis;

Animals in the zoo have the regular access to good food and they have vets on standby should they fall ill. This is a far more luxurious lifestyle than they would have in the jungle.

  • Do you think animals should be kept in zoos?;
  • cahsee released essay questions;
  • Igbo Dictionary?
  • Only when it's important.!

From human understanding to biological study. To see zoos as pure entertainment is myopic. Whatever the good intentions of zoo-keepers, animals in zoos suffer.


They are inevitably confined in unnaturally small spaces, and are kept from the public by cages and bars. They suffer psychological distress, often displayed by abnormal or self-destructive behaviour. Aquatic animals do not have enough water, birds are prevented from flying away by having their wings clipped and being kept in aviaries. There have in the past been many bad zoos and cruel zookeepers. It is imperative that these are reformed and weeded out.

Good zoos in which animals are well fed and well looked after in spacious surroundings are becoming the norm and should be encouraged. Zoos can exist without cruelty to animals, however, and so the fact that there are animal welfare problems with some zoos does not meant that all zoos should be shut down.

Why choose our homework help?

Adults and children visiting zoos will be given the subliminal message that it is OK to use animals for our own ends, however it impinges on their freedom or quality of life; thus zoos will encourage poor treatment of animals more generally. People do not go to zoos for educational reasons they simply go to be entertained and diverted by weird and wonderful creatures seen as objects of beauty or entertainment. As a form of education the zoo is deficient: the only way to understand an animal properly is to see it in its natural environment — the zoo gives a totally artificial and misleading view of the animal by isolating it from its ecosystem.

  • rosanna reyes dissertation.
  • science critical thinking skills;
  • A List of Arguments For and Against Zoos?
  • richard rodriguez scholarship boy essay!

Zoos nowadays are not marketed as places of entertainment - they are places of education. Most modern zoos have their main emphasis on conservation and education - the reason that so many schools take children to zoos is to teach them about nature, the environment, endangered species, and conservation. Far from encouraging bad treatment of animals, zoos provide a direct experience of other species that will increase ecological awareness.

Problems with the claim that zoos are beneficial because they help to conserve endangered species There are two problems with the claim that zoos are beneficial because they help to conserve endangered species. First, they do not have a very high success rate — many species are going extinct each week despite the good intentions of some zoos. This is partly because a very small captive community of a species is more prone to inter-breeding and birth defects.

Secondly, captive breeding to try to stave off extinction need not take place in the context of a zoo, where the public come to look at captive animals and often see them perform tricks. Captive breeding programmes should be undertaken in large nature reserves, not within the confines of a zoo.

One of the main functions of zoos is to breed endangered animals in captivity. If natural or human factors have made a species' own habitat a threatening environment then human intervention can preserve that species where it would certainly go extinct if there were no intervention.

What’s wrong with keeping birds in cages? | PETA

There are certainly problems with trying to conserve endangered species in this way but it is right that we should at least try to conserve them. And as long as animals are treated well in zoos there is no reason why conservation, education, and cruelty-free entertainment should not all be combined in a zoo.

There is also, of course, a valid role for breeding in different environments such as large nature reserves. Animal research may be valuable, but it does not need to happen in the context of confinement and human entertainment. As above, research into animals when it respects their rights and is not cruel or harmful may be valuable, but it does not need to happen in the context of confinement and human entertainment.

Also, the only way really to understand other species is to study them in their natural habitat and see how they interact socially and with other species of flora and fauna. As above we should take a 'both-and' approach rather than an 'either-or' approach. Animals can and should be studied in the wild but they can be studied more closely, more rigorously, and over a more sustained period of time in captivity.

Both sorts of study are valuable and, as in point 4, there is no reason why this should not be done in the context of a cruelty-free zoo as well as in other contexts. Animals should be left in the wild Animals are not made for captivity. They long to roam in the long grass of Africa, they long to chase other animals, and they long to play in large groups. No matter how we may try to replicate their surrounding in a zoo, we will never achieve the full result. Therefore, these animals will never be as happy as they would be in the wild. We are fighting with animals natural desires to be wild, and this is a battle that humans cannot win without destroying animals at the core.

Let nature take its course. How can we measure animal happiness?

Essay on Should Animals Be Kept in the Zoo?

Would humans be better off in the wild? Would 'we' prefer the wild? The truth is that these claims are based around the logically-skewed ideas of neo-classical animal rights groups. We cannot measure animal happiness. We cannot really say that they would be best left in the wild. All we can do is review at the information at hand.

Domesticated animals; treated well, would you say they were unhappy? Well then how can we argue that taking animals out of the wild is wrong? We cannot. So rather than banning zoos, we should ensure that relevant safety measures are in place to ensure that these animals are as well looked after as possible. Species have come and gone from time immemorial Dinosaurs are extinct without our interference ; Human beings are part of the animal kingdom thus food cycle and our involvement is part of nature. Taxes on smoothies and fruit juices should be reduced.

Imagine you are in your house and a monkey comes and takes you and put you in a box, they dress you up give you food that you may not like, then after they make you train by hitting you and forcing you to do horrible things after that stressful day of working you go back to this small uncomfortable box and they give you the same thing to eat again, the next day you wake up in this horrible box and they take you out of the box by hitting you and you go out to this bright were lots of animals are watching at you they all look impressive and they hit you for you to make the trick the animals clap and you are carried to the box again that is your life for the rest of the time you have.

Animals should have the same rights. Zoos are not anything like a prison in fact it is the apposite. It helps injured animals. Animals get enough food they never have to worry about their predators. Yeah I agree with the fact that zoos are a prison for animals but it keeps them from being extinct from the wild if animals are left behind in the wild it can leave them to extinction which is very bad so it is good that most zoos can look after the animals properly and at least the zoos can let kids and adults observe the animals up close without getting harmed to know its behaviour.

It is at least one way to preserve endangoured species, due global warming, humans invading their territory to build new cities or expanding farm land, also killing them for their own profitable pleasure, like hunting, to keep the animal as a trophy.

Wild Animals Should NOT Be Kept in Captivity

Should Animals be Kept in Zoos? Animals should not be kept in zoos! Zoo life in prevents the animals ability to think for itself. In zoos humans are feeding them at the same time every day. Humans use zoos for entertainment and money. Animals need to think for themselves. Animals that do not think for themselves are useless animals that dont know how to hunt. Animals lose their instinct by sitting around with human things and eating foods that are specially made for the certain type of animal.

Animals need their instinct to help them hunt and to be careful of their surroundings. Animals are supposed to hunt for their food not beg like domesticated animals. People need to let the animals hunt their own food. People would put bunnies and watch them be eaten and it would be done for entertainment. Animals need to learn independence and hunt for themselves not beg like animals.

Enquiries concerning reproduction outside the scope of the above should be sent to the Rights Department, Oxford University Press, at the address above You must not circulate this book in any other binding or cover and you must impose this same condition on any acquirer Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication.

Preservation of Financial Documents Books Should Be Audited Relations With Members Confidential Interest Coordinator A Church Officer.